In contemporary higher education, feedback is widely recognized as a vital component of the learning process. However, its true value lies not in isolated comments at the end of an assignment, but in its continuity, quality and integration across the learning experience.
When feedback is embedded into the educational journey and is delivered regularly, meaningfully and from diverse sources, it becomes a powerful driver of academic development, critical thinking and learner autonomy.
Strengthening Student Engagement and Motivation
Regular, actionable feedback has been shown to increase student motivation and deepen engagement. It provides learners with a clearer understanding of their progress, reinforces their connection to course objectives and supports a sense of direction in their studies. In contrast, feedback that is sporadic or delayed risks being perceived as irrelevant, diminishing its pedagogical value and weakening students’ investment in their learning.
Facilitating Academic Development
Integrated and continuous feedback plays a key role in guiding academic improvement. Specifically, feed-forward strategies (those that provide guidance for future tasks rather than merely highlighting past shortcomings) enable students to refine their learning strategies and apply constructive insights proactively. This forward-looking orientation has been shown to significantly enhance academic performance over time.
Promoting Critical Thinking and Learner Autonomy
Engagement with feedback from multiple sources encourages students to adopt a more active role in their learning. Peer feedback, in particular, fosters a deeper understanding of assessment criteria, cultivates evaluative judgment, and develops self-regulatory skills. These competencies are essential for students to become independent, reflective learners capable of transferring knowledge across contexts.
The Role of Diverse Feedback Sources
To maximize its educational impact, feedback should be derived from multiple perspectives, each offering unique insights and value:
Instructor Feedback
Instructor feedback remains central to students’ learning due to its perceived authority and depth of subject knowledge. However, for it to be most effective, it should move beyond one-way communication. Feedback that is dialogic (encouraging student reflection, questions, and response) has been found to significantly enhance understanding and skill development.
Peer Feedback
Despite initial student skepticism, peer feedback has consistently demonstrated positive effects when scaffolded appropriately. With adequate training, students can provide insightful commentary that not only supports their peers’ development but also deepens their own cognitive engagement with the subject matter. This dual benefit makes peer review a valuable pedagogical practice.
External Feedback
Input from external parties, such as internship supervisors or industry mentors, offers authenticity and relevance that is often difficult to replicate in classroom settings. This form of feedback connects academic learning with professional expectations, supports skill transferability and prepares students for real-world challenges.
Reference list
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Lacewell, J. L. (2015). The influence of perceived similarity, affect and trust on the performance of student learning groups. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/428/
Köppe, C., Verhoeff, R. P., & Van Joolingen, W. (2024). Elements for understanding and fostering self-assessment of learning artifacts in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1213108
Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z
Myllykoski-Laine, S., Parpala, A., Hailikari, T., & Postareff, L. (2024). Using self-reflection to support higher education teaching. Reflective Practice, 25(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2376784
Pastore, S. (2017). Research Designs and Methods in Self-assessment Studies: A content analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(4), 257. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i4.8921
Yan, Z., Wang, X., Boud, D., & Lao, H. (2021). The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2012644
About the Author: Yas Farahani
